Re: [PATCH 0/2] Ftrace direct call samples improvements

[Catalin Marinas]

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 04:20:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:06:58 +0200
> Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This series is a subset of [1] that didn't go through the arm64 tree.
> > 
> > - The first patch fixes a small bug when a direct call sample is loaded on x86
> > - The second patch adds arm64 support to all direct calls samples
> > 
> > They are sent together because the second one depends on the first one.
> > 
> > This series applies cleanly on Linus's master branch. It needs the first two
> > patches of [1] which, at the time of writing, don't seem to have made it to the
> > trace/linux-trace tree but I suppose they could be pulled from Linus's master
> > 
> > 1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230405180250.2046566-1-revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > Florent Revest (2):
> >   samples: ftrace: Save required argument registers in sample
> >     trampolines
> >   arm64: ftrace: Add direct call trampoline samples support
> 
> Is this going through the arm64 tree, or should it go through mine?

Feel free to take it through your tree.

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>