Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards

[Kees Cook]

On June 8, 2023 7:25:27 PM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 1:06 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>         struct obj *p __free(kfree) = kmalloc(...);
>
>Yeah, the above actually looks really good to me - I like the naming
>here, and the use looks very logical to me.
>
>Of course, maybe once I see the patches that use this I go "uhh", but
>at least for now I think you've hit on a rather legible syntax.
>
>I'm still a bit unsure of the "no_free_ptr(p)" naming, but at least
>it's pretty clear about what it does.
>
>So my only worry is that it's not pretty and to the point like your
>"__free(kfree)" syntax.
>
>But it feels workable and not misleading, so unless somebody can come
>up with a better name, I think it's ok.

I like the proposed "take" naming, and before reading that reply I was going to suggest "keep". *shrug*


-- 
Kees Cook