Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] clk: qcom: camcc-sm8550: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8550

From: Jagadeesh Kona
Date: Fri Jun 09 2023 - 07:50:17 EST


Hi Dmitry,

Thanks for your review!

On 6/1/2023 8:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 01/06/2023 17:34, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
Add support for the camera clock controller for camera clients to be
able to request for camcc clocks on SM8550 platform.

Co-developed-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since V2:
  - No changes
Changes since V1:
  - Sorted the PLL names in proper order
  - Updated all PLL configurations to lower case hex
  - Reused evo ops instead of adding new ops for ole pll
  - Moved few clocks to separate patch to fix patch too long error

  drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig        |    7 +
  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile       |    1 +
  drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sm8550.c | 3405 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 3413 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sm8550.c


[skipped]

+
+static struct platform_driver cam_cc_sm8550_driver = {
+    .probe = cam_cc_sm8550_probe,
+    .driver = {
+        .name = "cam_cc-sm8550",
+        .of_match_table = cam_cc_sm8550_match_table,
+    },
+};
+
+static int __init cam_cc_sm8550_init(void)
+{
+    return platform_driver_register(&cam_cc_sm8550_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(cam_cc_sm8550_init);
+
+static void __exit cam_cc_sm8550_exit(void)
+{
+    platform_driver_unregister(&cam_cc_sm8550_driver);
+}
+module_exit(cam_cc_sm8550_exit);

Please convert this to use module_platform_driver


We still have to evaluate if module_platform_driver() works for us in all scenarios. We will post a cleanup patch once we conclude on module_platform_driver().

+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI CAMCC SM8550 Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");


Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh