Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: add pci_device_id driver_data parse support

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Jun 09 2023 - 02:13:54 EST


On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:50:47AM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
> The dwc2 driver has everything we need to run in PCI mode except
> for pci_device_id driver_data parse. With that to set Loongson
> dwc2 element and added identified as PCI_VENDOR_ID_LOONGSON
> and PCI_DEVICE_ID_LOONGSON_DWC2 in dwc2_pci_ids, the Loongson
> dwc2 controller will work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Change in v2:
> 1. Move the dwc2 pci ID from pci_ids.h to params.c.
> 2. Add some code logic to ensure that the current device is
> a PCI device.
> 3. Fix the compile issue when dwc2 pci driver as module.
>
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 1 +
> drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/dwc2/pci.c | 14 +-------------
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index 0bb4c0c845bf..c92a1da46a01 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -1330,6 +1330,7 @@ irqreturn_t dwc2_handle_common_intr(int irq, void *dev);
> /* The device ID match table */
> extern const struct of_device_id dwc2_of_match_table[];
> extern const struct acpi_device_id dwc2_acpi_match[];
> +extern const struct pci_device_id dwc2_pci_ids[];
>
> int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_disable(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
> index 21d16533bd2f..6b68a8830781 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
> @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/usb/of.h>
> +#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> #include "core.h"
>
> +#define PCI_PRODUCT_ID_HAPS_HSOTG 0xabc0
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_LOONGSON_DWC2 0x7a04
> +
> static void dwc2_set_bcm_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> {
> struct dwc2_core_params *p = &hsotg->params;
> @@ -55,6 +60,14 @@ static void dwc2_set_jz4775_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> !device_property_read_bool(hsotg->dev, "disable-over-current");
> }
>
> +static void dwc2_set_loongson_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> +{
> + struct dwc2_core_params *p = &hsotg->params;
> +
> + p->phy_utmi_width = 8;
> + p->power_down = DWC2_POWER_DOWN_PARAM_PARTIAL;
> +}
> +
> static void dwc2_set_x1600_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> {
> struct dwc2_core_params *p = &hsotg->params;
> @@ -281,6 +294,23 @@ const struct acpi_device_id dwc2_acpi_match[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dwc2_acpi_match);
>
> +const struct pci_device_id dwc2_pci_ids[] = {
> + {
> + PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, PCI_PRODUCT_ID_HAPS_HSOTG),
> + },
> + {
> + PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_STMICRO,
> + PCI_DEVICE_ID_STMICRO_USB_OTG),
> + },
> + {
> + PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_LOONGSON, PCI_DEVICE_ID_LOONGSON_DWC2),
> + .driver_data = (unsigned long)dwc2_set_loongson_params,
> + },
> + { /* end: all zeroes */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, dwc2_pci_ids);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dwc2_pci_ids);
> +
> static void dwc2_set_param_otg_cap(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> {
> switch (hsotg->hw_params.op_mode) {
> @@ -927,13 +957,20 @@ int dwc2_init_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> if (match && match->data) {
> set_params = match->data;
> set_params(hsotg);
> - } else {
> + } else if (!match) {
> const struct acpi_device_id *amatch;
> + const struct pci_device_id *pmatch = NULL;
>
> amatch = acpi_match_device(dwc2_acpi_match, hsotg->dev);
> if (amatch && amatch->driver_data) {
> set_params = (set_params_cb)amatch->driver_data;
> set_params(hsotg);
> + } else if (!amatch)
> + pmatch = pci_match_id(dwc2_pci_ids, to_pci_dev(hsotg->dev->parent));

At this point in time, how can you guarantee that the parent device
really is a PCI one? This function is being called from a platform
device callback, and platform devices should NEVER be a child of a PCI
device, as that's not how PCI or platform devices work.

So how is this even possible?

confused,

greg k-h