Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] riscv: ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jun 08 2023 - 21:58:50 EST



Can I get an ack from a RISC-V maintainer?

-- Steve


On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 05:42:19 -0700
Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The previous patch ("function_graph: Support recording and printing
> the return value of function") has laid the groundwork for the for
> the funcgraph-retval, and this modification makes it available on
> the RISC-V platform.
>
> We introduce a new structure called fgraph_ret_regs for the RISC-V
> platform to hold return registers and the frame pointer. We then
> fill its content in the return_to_handler and pass its address to
> the function ftrace_return_to_handler to record the return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v10:
> - Use CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER to control fgraph_ret_regs definition
>
> v9:
> - Update the commit message
>
> v8:
> - Modify the control range of CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/mcount.S | 7 +------
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index eb7f29a412f8..108538815309 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && MMU && $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=8)
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL
> + select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL if HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL && !PREEMPTION
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index d47d87c2d7e3..740a979171e5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -111,4 +111,25 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */
>
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> +struct fgraph_ret_regs {
> + unsigned long a1;
> + unsigned long a0;
> + unsigned long s0;
> + unsigned long ra;
> +};
> +
> +static inline unsigned long fgraph_ret_regs_return_value(struct fgraph_ret_regs *ret_regs)
> +{
> + return ret_regs->a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long fgraph_ret_regs_frame_pointer(struct fgraph_ret_regs *ret_regs)
> +{
> + return ret_regs->s0;
> +}
> +#endif /* ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FTRACE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount.S
> index 30102aadc4d7..8a6e5a9e842a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount.S
> @@ -65,13 +65,8 @@ ENTRY(return_to_handler)
> * So alternatively we check the *old* frame pointer position, that is, the
> * value stored in -16(s0) on entry, and the s0 on return.
> */
> -#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
> - mv t6, s0
> -#endif
> SAVE_RET_ABI_STATE
> -#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
> - mv a0, t6
> -#endif
> + mv a0, sp
> call ftrace_return_to_handler
> mv a2, a0
> RESTORE_RET_ABI_STATE