Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/VGA: tidy up the code and comment format

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Thu Jun 08 2023 - 15:07:38 EST


Capitalize subject to match ("Tidy ...")

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:43:19PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch replaces the leading space with a tab and removes the double
> blank line, no functional change.

Can you move this to the end of the series? The functional changes
are more likely to be backported, and I think the backport may be a
little easier without the cleanup in the middle.

> /* we could in theory hand out locks on IO and mem
> - * separately to userspace but it can cause deadlocks */
> + * separately to userspace but it can cause deadlocks
> + */

Since you're touching this anyway, can you update it to the
conventional multi-line comment style:

/*
* We could in theory ...
*/

And capitalize "We", add a period at end, and rewrap to fill 78
columns or so? Same for other comments below.

> +++ b/include/linux/vgaarb.h
> @@ -23,9 +23,7 @@
> * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
> - * DEALINGS
> - * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> - *
> + * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> */

Can you make a separate patch to replace this entire copyright notice
with the appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier header?
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst has details.

Bjorn