Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/uclamp: Set max_spare_cap_cpu even if max_spare_cap is 0

[Hongyan Xia]

Hi Qais,

On 2023-02-11 17:28, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 02/07/23 10:45, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Isn't it better to go back to v1 form then? The inconsistent type paired with
> the cast isn't getting too ugly for me :(
>
> I don't think we can convert cpu_cap to long without having to do more work as
> it is used with 'util'.

Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but why can't we convert util to 
long? The only place I see which mixes with util is

	lsub_positive(&cpu_cap, util);

but at this point both cpu_cap and util should have sane values (top bit 
not set) so doing clamped subtraction should just work fine?

Hongyan