Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile for rv32

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Jun 06 2023 - 07:22:04 EST


On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 13:12, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, at 11:05, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
>> would seem more consistent with how x86 is handled, and would
>> probably be more easily extensible if we want to also make
>> this work with other sub-targets like mipseb, armv5 or ppc32
>> in the future.
>
> As Arnd and Thomas suggested to align with x86, I just tried to find a
> solution to avoid mixing the use of _ARCH and ARCH in this Makefile.
>
> Since both riscv32 and riscv64 share the same SRCARCH=riscv (arch/riscv),
> and the kernel side doesn't accept riscv32 or riscv64 currently, we need to
> manually convert them to _ARCH=riscv and pass them to the kernel makefile
> like this: ARCH=$(_ARCH), it mixes the use of _ARCH and ARCH, this is why I
> used the '$(if' method currently.
>
> The solution is adding something like x86 in the kernel Makefile:
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 9d765ebcccf1..a442c893d795 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -415,6 +415,14 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),parisc64)
> SRCARCH := parisc
> endif
>
> +# Additional ARCH settings for riscv
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv32)
> + SRCARCH := riscv
> +endif
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv64)
> + SRCARCH := riscv
> +endif
> +
> export cross_compiling :=
> ifneq ($(SRCARCH),$(SUBARCH))
> cross_compiling := 1

I've never been a big fan of the top-level $(ARCH) setting
in the kernel, is there a reason this has to be the same
as the variable in tools/include/nolibc? If not, I'd just
leave the Linux Makefile unchanged.

For userspace we have a lot more target names than
arch/*/ directories in the kernel, and I don't think
I'd want to enumerate all the possibilities in the
build system globally.
> b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> index 4a3a105e1fdf..1b2247a6365d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ IMAGE_x86 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> IMAGE_arm64 = arch/arm64/boot/Image
> IMAGE_arm = arch/arm/boot/zImage
> IMAGE_mips = vmlinuz
> +IMAGE_riscv32 = arch/riscv/boot/Image
> +IMAGE_riscv64 = arch/riscv/boot/Image
> IMAGE_riscv = arch/riscv/boot/Image
> IMAGE_s390 = arch/s390/boot/bzImage
> IMAGE_loongarch = arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.efi
> @@ -34,6 +36,8 @@ DEFCONFIG_x86 = defconfig
> DEFCONFIG_arm64 = defconfig
> DEFCONFIG_arm = multi_v7_defconfig
> DEFCONFIG_mips = malta_defconfig
> +DEFCONFIG_riscv32 = rv32_defconfig
> +DEFCONFIG_riscv64 = defconfig
...

Right, that part looks good to me.

Arnd