[PATCH -next] blk-ioc: fix recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() in ioc_clear_queue()

[Yu Kuai]

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() is not safe, because spin_unlock_irq()
will enable irq unconditionally:

spin_lock_irq	queue_lock	-> disable irq
spin_lock_irq	ioc->lock
spin_unlock_irq ioc->lock	-> enable irq
/*
 * AA dead lock will be triggered if current context is preempted by irq,
 * and irq try to hold queue_lock again.
 */
spin_unlock_irq queue_lock

Fix this problem by using spin_lock/unlock() directly for 'ioc->lock'.

Fixes: 5a0ac57c48aa ("blk-ioc: protect ioc_destroy_icq() by 'queue_lock'")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-ioc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
index d5db92e62c43..25dd4db11121 100644
--- a/block/blk-ioc.c
+++ b/block/blk-ioc.c
@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void ioc_clear_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 		 * Other context won't hold ioc lock to wait for queue_lock, see
 		 * details in ioc_release_fn().
 		 */
-		spin_lock_irq(&icq->ioc->lock);
+		spin_lock(&icq->ioc->lock);
 		ioc_destroy_icq(icq);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&icq->ioc->lock);
+		spin_unlock(&icq->ioc->lock);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 }
-- 
2.39.2