Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: Add the support of cpufreq on SDX75

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 5.06.2023 18:29, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add the support of cpufreq to enable the cpufreq scaling
> on SDX75 SoC. Also add CPU specific information to build
> energy model for EAS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> index 47170ae..e1887a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> @@ -47,10 +47,14 @@
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>;
>  			power-domain-names = "psci";
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> +			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> +			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> +			dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>  			L2_0: l2-cache {
>  				compatible = "cache";
>  				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
> @@ -64,10 +68,14 @@
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			power-domains = <&CPU_PD1>;
>  			power-domain-names = "psci";
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_100>;
> +			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> +			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> +			dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>  			L2_100: l2-cache {
>  				compatible = "cache";
>  				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
> @@ -78,10 +86,14 @@
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			power-domains = <&CPU_PD2>;
>  			power-domain-names = "psci";
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_200>;
> +			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> +			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> +			dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>  			L2_200: l2-cache {
>  				compatible = "cache";
>  				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
> @@ -92,10 +104,14 @@
>  			device_type = "cpu";
>  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
> +			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>  			enable-method = "psci";
>  			power-domains = <&CPU_PD3>;
>  			power-domain-names = "psci";
>  			next-level-cache = <&L2_300>;
> +			qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> +			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
That sounds a bit bogus.. Thinking about it, it sounds bogus on most
platforms we have support for! I guess SM8250 big cores aren't *really*
equally as powerful..

> +			dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>  			L2_300: l2-cache {
>  				compatible = "cache";
>  				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
> @@ -605,6 +621,20 @@
>  			};
>  
>  		};
> +
> +		cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@17d91000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sdx75-cpufreq-epss", "qcom,cpufreq-epss";
> +			reg = <0 0x17d91000 0 0x1000>;
You used 0x0 instead of 0 everywhere else, please do so here as well
to keep things consistent.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>

Konrad
> +			reg-names = "freq-domain0";
> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GPLL0>;
> +			clock-names = "xo",
> +				      "alternate";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-names = "dcvsh-irq-0";
> +			#freq-domain-cells = <1>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +		};
>  	};
>  
>  	timer {