Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] tracing/user_events: Fix the incorrect trace record for empty arguments events

[Beau Belgrave]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:30:20PM +0800, sunliming wrote:
> The user_events support events that has empty arguments. But the trace event
> is discarded and not really committed when the arguments is empty. Fix this
> by not attempting to copy in zero-length data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

This series looks good to me, functionally. I applied it locally and ran
this code with the new test additions. Everything works well. Thank you!

The only thing I ask before an ACK is patch 2 and 4 in the series only use
"user_events: " prefix. Can you change these to "selftests/user_events: "?

You marked 3 this way, so I'd like to stick with a consistent form:
I think it would be good going forward we use "tracing/user_events"
for functional changes and "selftests/user_events" for self test
changes.

Thanks,
-Beau

>  kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> index 0d91dac206ff..698703a3d234 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static void user_event_ftrace(struct user_event *user, struct iov_iter *i,
>  	if (unlikely(!entry))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!copy_nofault(entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> +	if (unlikely(i->count != 0 && !copy_nofault(entry + 1, i->count, i)))
>  		goto discard;
>  
>  	if (!list_empty(&user->validators) &&
> @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ static void user_event_perf(struct user_event *user, struct iov_iter *i,
>  
>  		perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
>  
> -		if (unlikely(!copy_nofault(perf_entry + 1, i->count, i)))
> +		if (unlikely(i->count != 0 && !copy_nofault(perf_entry + 1, i->count, i)))
>  			goto discard;
>  
>  		if (!list_empty(&user->validators) &&
> -- 
> 2.25.1