Re: [PATCH 15/21] dt-bindings: irqchip/atmel-aic5: Add support for sam9x7 aic

[Conor Dooley]

On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 10:19:50PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Varshini,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 01:32:37AM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> > Document the support added for the Advanced interrupt controller(AIC)
> > chip in the sam9x7 soc family
> 
> Please do not add new family based compatibles, but rather use per-soc
> compatibles instead.

These things leave me penally confused. Afaiu, sam9x60 is a particular
SoC. sam9x7 is actually a family, containing sam9x70, sam9x72 and
sam9x75. It would appear to me that each should have its own compatible,
no?

> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.txt      | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.txt
> > index 7079d44bf3ba..2c267a66a3ea 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.txt
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
> >  - compatible: Should be:
> >      - "atmel,<chip>-aic" where  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "sama5d2",
> >        "sama5d3" or "sama5d4"
> > -    - "microchip,<chip>-aic" where <chip> can be "sam9x60"
> > +    - "microchip,<chip>-aic" where <chip> can be "sam9x60", "sam9x7"
> >  
> >  - interrupt-controller: Identifies the node as an interrupt controller.
> >  - #interrupt-cells: The number of cells to define the interrupts. It should be 3.
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature