Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: subsystem-apis: Categorize remaining subsystems

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 6/2/23 17:19, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> As you're still newbie here, I'd recommend you to try contributing to
>> drivers/staging/ first in order to gain experience on kernel developement
>> workflow. Also, you use your RedHat address, so I expect you have been
>> given kernel development training from your company (and doesn't make
>> trivial errors like these ones).
> 
> Bagas, please.  I'll ask you directly: please don't go telling
> documentation contributors how to comport themselves; you have plenty
> enough to learn yourself on that front.  It's hard enough to get
> contributors to the documentation as it is without random people showing
> up and giving orders.
> 

Hi jon, thanks for another tip. I also learn contributing patches the
hard way by being rejected (honestly sometimes I learn, sometimes I
don't).

Let me clarify the situation. Previously in v2, I reviewed Costa's patch
by replying with proposing my own version, keeping patch author intact.
There, I categorized a few more items while sorting all of them. I
treated it as minor fixup that was attributed by brackets in the
SoB area (I could also use Co-developed-by: for this purpose too).
Then, Costa rerolled v3 using my version, but the From: address
in the patch message is mine without corresponding SoB, hence when you
apply his v3, there would be author mismatch (commit author is me
yet different SoB from him). I expected that my proposal in v2 is
carried by him (and also have SoB from both me and him as the sender
who carried my patch).

> I have distractions that are increasing my (already less than stellar)
> latency, but I'll get to this stuff.
> 

I'm too, because I'm AuDHD and I can (and do) easily distracted; living
in a paradox between routine fixation and desire for quick action :).

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara