Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/39] 6.1.32-rc2 review

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Fri Jun 02 2023 - 03:01:29 EST

Next message: menglong8 . dong: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: make MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS 14"
Previous message: menglong8 . dong: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 14 for TRACING"
In reply to: ogasawara takeshi: "Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/39] 6.1.32-rc2 review"
Next in thread: Ron Economos: "Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/39] 6.1.32-rc2 review"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 03:35:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.32 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: menglong8 . dong: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: make MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS 14"
Previous message: menglong8 . dong: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 14 for TRACING"
In reply to: ogasawara takeshi: "Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/39] 6.1.32-rc2 review"
Next in thread: Ron Economos: "Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/39] 6.1.32-rc2 review"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]