Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] PCI: endpoint: Pass EPF device ID to the probe function

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Thu Jun 01 2023 - 23:19:58 EST


On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 08:16:45AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 6/1/23 23:57, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Currently, the EPF probe function doesn't get the device ID argument needed
> > to correctly identify the device table ID of the EPF device.
> >
> > When multiple entries are added to the "struct pci_epf_device_id" table,
> > the probe function needs to identify the correct one. This is achieved by
> > modifying the pci_epf_match_id() function to return the match ID pointer
> > and passing it to the driver's probe function.
> >
> > pci_epf_device_match() function can return bool based on the return value
> > of pci_epf_match_id().
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [...]
>
> > static int pci_epf_device_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > @@ -510,8 +510,12 @@ static int pci_epf_device_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > struct pci_epf *epf = to_pci_epf(dev);
> > struct pci_epf_driver *driver = to_pci_epf_driver(drv);
> >
> > - if (driver->id_table)
> > - return pci_epf_match_id(driver->id_table, epf);
> > + if (driver->id_table) {
> > + if (pci_epf_match_id(driver->id_table, epf))
> > + return true;
> > + else
> > + return false;
>
> return pci_epf_match_id(driver->id_table, epf) != NULL;
>
> is simpler. If you do not like this, at least drop the "else" as it is not
> necessary at all.
>

I settle for simplicity :) Also, there is a theoretical possibility of passing
NULL as the id->name, so doesn't want to rule out that.

> > + }
> >
> > return !strcmp(epf->name, drv->name);
> > }
> > @@ -520,13 +524,15 @@ static int pci_epf_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct pci_epf *epf = to_pci_epf(dev);
> > struct pci_epf_driver *driver = to_pci_epf_driver(dev->driver);
> > + const struct pci_epf_device_id *id;
> >
> > if (!driver->probe)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > epf->driver = driver;
> > + id = pci_epf_match_id(driver->id_table, epf);
>
> Not sure that the id variable is that useful.
>

Thought it makes the code clear but looking again, it doesn't hurt to call match
directly in probe. Will change it in next iteration.

- Mani

> >
> > - return driver->probe(epf);
> > + return driver->probe(epf, id);
> > }
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்