Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mt65xx: add additional clocks

From: Daniel Golle
Date: Thu Jun 01 2023 - 15:10:28 EST


On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/05/2023 18:10, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Add pck and mck clocks which are needed to access I2C registers on MT7981.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > index fda0467cdd954..550795f6573c5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ properties:
> > - const: dma
> > - const: arb
> > - const: pmic
> > + - const: mck
> > + - const: pck
> >
>
> Adding names does not magically add the clocks. This wasn't tested.

Adding the clocks is done in patch 2/2 which just wasn't sent to
devicetree@ and dt maintainers, but to the relevant mailing lists
instead. Was that wrong and should I always send the complete series
also to devicetree@ as well as dt maintainers?

Anyway. It turns out that arb and pmic clocks are intended for that,
so we can cancel this and I'll just use those instead.