Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] dt-bindings: clocks: at91sam9x5-sckc: convert to yaml

[Claudiu.Beznea]

On 17.05.2023 17:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 12:41:19 +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Convert Atmel slow clock controller documentation to yaml.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt  | 30 --------
>>  .../bindings/clock/atmel,at91sam9x5-sckc.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91sam9x5-sckc.yaml
>>
> 
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> 
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
> 
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1782586
> 
> 
> sckc@fffffe50: '#clock-cells' is a required property
>         arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dtb
> 
> sckc@fffffe50: 'clocks' is a required property
>         arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dtb
> 
> sckc@fffffe50: 'slck', 'slow_osc', 'slow_rc_osc' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>         arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dtb

Is it possible that this has been checked on a wrong base? I'm asking this
because:
- patch 3/5 in this series uses proper bindings for slow clock controller
  on at91sam9n12.dtsi (which includes #clock-cells and clocks bindings and
  removes slck, slow_osc, slow_rc_osc)
- patch 4/5 in this series does s/sckc@/clock-controller@/ in all AT91
  device trees.

Moreover, I've re-checked all the individual dtsi files that describes a
slow clock controller and all descriptions has the "#clock-cells", "clocks"
property available and no slck, slow_osc, slow_rc_osc as childs of
sckc@fffffe50.

If not, could you please let me know your checker command?

Thank you,
Claudiu