Re: [PATCH] PCI: Only put >= 2015 root ports into D3 on Intel

From: Limonciello, Mario
Date: Wed May 17 2023 - 22:01:02 EST



On 5/17/2023 8:48 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote:

On 5/17/2023 7:58 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 07:33:17AM -0500, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
AFAICT the actual issue is entirely a wakeup platform firmware sequencing
issue
while in a hardware sleep state and not PMEs.

It's only exposed by putting the root ports into D3 over s2idle.
But there are two ways to enter s2idle (well or the S0ix whatever is the
AMD term for that). Either through system sleep or simply waiting that
all the needed devices runtime suspend. There should be no difference
from device perspective AFAICT.
I should correct that the wakes may be configured differently, though.

On AMD all devices in runtime suspend and SoC entering system
suspend aren't the same state.
Okay.

As an experiment on an unpatched kernel if I avoid letting amd-pmc bind then
the
hardware will never enter a hardware sleep state over Linux s2idle and this
issue
doesn't occur.

That shows that PMEs *do* work from D3cold.

With all of this I have to wonder if the Windows behavior of what to do with
the root
ports is tied to the uPEP requirements specified in the firmware.

Linux doesn't do any enforcement or adjustments from what uPEP indicates.

The uPEP constraints for the root port in question in an affected AMD system
has:

                      Package (0x04)
                      {
                          Zero,
                          "\\_SB.PCI0.GP19",
                          Zero,
                          Zero
                      },

AMD's parsing is through 'lpi_device_get_constraints_amd' so that structure
shows
as not enabled and doesn't specify any D-state requirements.
AFAIK this object does not exist in ChromeOS so Linux cannot use it
there.
OK that means that if we came up with a solution that utilized
uPEP that it would have to remain optional.
Right.

What do they specify for Intel on a matching root port?
I think the corresponding entry in ADL-P system for TBT PCIe root port 0
looks like this:

    Package (0x03)
    {
        "\\_SB.PC00.TRP0",
        Zero,
        Package (0x02)
        {
        Zero,
        Package (0x02)
        {
            0xFF,
            0x03
        }
        }
    },

I'm not entirely sure what does it tell? ;-)
It's parsed using `lpi_device_get_constraints`.

So should I follow it right this means for ACPI device
\\_SB.PC00.TRP0 the constraint is disabled.

It's described as
Version 0, UID 0xFF has a minimum D-state of 3.
I see, so it needs to be in D3 for this "constraint" to be valid.

That means my idea to try to only change D-states at
suspend for enabled constraints won't help.
:(

At least on an Alder Lake P system can you check
whether your root ports actually respond
affirmatively to acpi_pci_bridge_d3() or they need
to fall back to that logic?

In my case the problematic ones don't have _PRW or
_S0W, which might explain why Windows doesn't try
to use D3 (hot or cold) for them either.

If the root ports on your current systems do respond
through acpi_pci_bridge_d3() a possible solution here
might be an allow list for systems from 2015-2018 rather
than everything > 2015.

Actually this is exactly it.  The function is missing a call

for platform_pci_power_manageable().

I'll send out a v2.