Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: microchip: add missing cache properties

From: Nicolas Ferre
Date: Wed May 17 2023 - 11:23:39 EST


On 17/05/2023 at 14:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:46:38PM +0200, Steen Hegelund wrote:
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 13:37 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:10:53PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

For future (and all previous patches), please think what do you
(you=Microchip) want to do with it. If you do not handle the patches,
then someone should or the platform should be marked as "Odd fixes".

If noone is set up to actually be the maintainer of the tree, and the
patch volume is low, it might be a good idea to combine its maintenance
with some of the other microchip trees.

I've added Nicolas to CC here, since he is the main maintainer for the
32-bit ARM Microchip stuff. For some context, I maintain the RISC-V
Microchip bits and a few other things like dt-bindings and some
non-microchip RISC-V platforms.

If you like, I could easily pick up patches for
arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/* as I am already sending PRs to Arnd for
other trees and another branch would not be much overhead!

Clearly I do not know the hardware at all, and reviewing the patches
would still be up to you, but I could handle the "administrative" side
of things (applying the patches & sending PRs) if that would be helpful?

Otherwise, Nicolas & I could probably help you through setting things up
to send PRs without taking up Krzysztof's time?

Either works for me!

It would be preferable for me if you (Conor) would handle the
arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/* tree as you suggested. It is not often we
update it, so it will hopefully be low overhead for you.

Okay. I will send a patch for MAINTAINERS then - although I'll give
Nicolas a change to look at it this thread first ;)

Yes, sure thing that I can be added as maintainer of the arm64 part of Microchip, you can add me to a MAINTAINERS entry taking care of this and use our group git tree for this purpose, we'll add branches for that.

If the mpu32 guys ever decide to become mpu64 then we can perhaps
re-visit things.

Thanks to both of you for the assistance.
>
No worries chief.

Thanks Conor for the heads-up. Best regards,
Nicolas

--
Nicolas Ferre