Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: add mediatek mipi csi driver v 0.5

[Julien Stephan]

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:07:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/05/2023 11:05, Julien Stephan wrote:
> > From: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This adds the bindings, for the MIPI CD-PHY module v 0.5 embedded in
> > some Mediatek soc, such as the mt8365
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> What are the changes? IOW: changelog here or in cover letter.
>
Hi Krzysztof,
I added a changelog in the cover letter, but I will try to be more
descritpive next time. Changes from v1 are mainly style issues fixed
(mostly from your first review)

> Subject: you have some multiple spaces.
>
> Subject: drop driver. Bindings are not for drivers.
>
> > ---
> >  .../phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml        | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 ++
> >  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5aa8c0b41cdf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-Only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Mediatek Sensor Interface MIPI CSI CD-PHY
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > +  - Andy Hsieh <andy.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +description:
> > +  The SENINF CD-PHY is a set of CD-PHY connected to the SENINF CSI-2
> > +  receivers. The number of PHYs depends on the SoC model.
> > +  Depending on the soc model, each PHYs can support CDPHY or DPHY only
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5
>
> SoC based compatibles. 0-5 is odd.
>
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  '#phy-cells':
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  mediatek,is_cdphy:
>
> No underscores in node names.
>
> > +    description:
> > +      Specify if the current phy support CDPHY configuration
>
> Why this cannot be implied from compatible? Add specific compatibles.
>
>
This cannot be implied by compatible because the number of phys depends
on the soc and each phy can be either D-PHY only or CD-PHY capable.
For example mt8365 has 2 phy: CSI0 and CSI1. CSI1 is DPHY only and CSI0 is CD-PHY

Regards,
Julien
> > +    type: boolean
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - '#phy-cells'
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    soc {
> > +      #address-cells = <2>;
> > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +      mipi_rx_csi0: mipi_rx_csi0@11c10000 {
>
> No underscores in node names. How this is v2?
>
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5";
> > +        reg = <0 0x11C10000 0 0x2000>;
> > +        status = "okay";
>
> Drop
>
> > +        mediatek,is_cdphy;
> > +        #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +      };
> > +
> > +      mipi_rx_csi1: mipi-rx-csi1@11c12000 {
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5";
> > +        reg = <0 0x11C12000 0 0x2000>;
> > +        status = "disabled";
>
> ???
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>