Re: Situation of CONFIG_BLK_WBT_MQ after commit b11d31ae01e6 ("blk-wbt: remove unnecessary check in wbt_enable_default()")

[Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

[CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions:
https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html]

[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 08.05.23 06:37, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> The commit b11d31ae01e6 ("blk-wbt: remove unnecessary check in
> wbt_enable_default()") removes the only reference to the config
> BLK_WBT_MQ in the kernel tree.
> [...]

Thanks for the report. I know a fix is already in the works but to
ensure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding
it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced b11d31ae01e6
#regzbot title block/blk-wbt: wbt can't be disabled by default
#regzbot ignore-activity
#regzbot monitor:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230512093554.911753-2-yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
the footer of this mail.

Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
to the report (the parent of this mail). See page linked in footer for
details.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.