Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] md/raid10: fix overflow in safe_delay_store

From: Li Nan
Date: Sun May 14 2023 - 07:18:17 EST




在 2023/5/6 10:00, Yu Kuai 写道:
Hi,

在 2023/05/06 9:23, linan666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 写道:
From: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>

There is no input check when echo md/safe_mode_delay, and overflow will
occur. There is risk of overflow in strict_strtoul_scaled(), too. Fix it
by using kstrtoul instead of parsing word one by one.

Other than some nits below, this patch looks good to me,
feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fixes: 72e02075a33f ("md: factor out parsing of fixed-point numbers")
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/md/md.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 8e344b4b3444..fd5c3babcd6d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -3767,52 +3767,74 @@ static int analyze_sbs(struct mddev *mddev)
   */
  int strict_strtoul_scaled(const char *cp, unsigned long *res, int scale)
  {
-    unsigned long result = 0;
-    long decimals = -1;
-    while (isdigit(*cp) || (*cp == '.' && decimals < 0)) {
-        if (*cp == '.')
-            decimals = 0;
-        else if (decimals < scale) {
-            unsigned int value;
-            value = *cp - '0';
-            result = result * 10 + value;
-            if (decimals >= 0)
-                decimals++;
-        }
-        cp++;
-    }
-    if (*cp == '\n')
-        cp++;
-    if (*cp)
+    unsigned long result = 0, decimals = 0;
+    char *pos, *str;
+    int rv;
+
+    str = kmemdup_nul(cp, strlen(cp), GFP_KERNEL);
+    if (!str)
+        return -ENOMEM;
+    pos = strchr(str, '.');
+    if (pos) {
+        int cnt = scale;
+
+        *pos = '\0';
+        while (isdigit(*(++pos))) {
+            if (cnt) {
+                decimals = decimals * 10 + *pos - '0';
+                cnt--;
+            }
+        }
+        if (*pos == '\n')
+            pos++;
+        if (*pos) {
+            kfree(str);
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
+        decimals *= int_pow(10, cnt);
+    }
+
+    rv = kstrtoul(str, 10, &result);
+    kfree(str);
+    if (rv)
+        return rv;
+
+    if (result > (ULONG_MAX - decimals) / (unsigned int)int_pow(10, scale))

This is correct, I guess the reason to use unsigned int is that u64/u64
will compile error in some 32-bit architecture. It's better to use
div64_u64() here.

          return -EINVAL;
-    if (decimals < 0)
-        decimals = 0;
-    *res = result * int_pow(10, scale - decimals);
-    return 0;
+    *res = result * int_pow(10, scale) + decimals;
+
+    return rv;
  }
  static ssize_t
  safe_delay_show(struct mddev *mddev, char *page)
  {
-    int msec = (mddev->safemode_delay*1000)/HZ;
-    return sprintf(page, "%d.%03d\n", msec/1000, msec%1000);
+    unsigned int msec = ((unsigned long)mddev->safemode_delay*1000)/HZ;
+
+    return sprintf(page, "%u.%03u\n", msec/1000, msec%1000);
  }
  static ssize_t
  safe_delay_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *cbuf, size_t len)
  {
      unsigned long msec;
+    int ret;
      if (mddev_is_clustered(mddev)) {
          pr_warn("md: Safemode is disabled for clustered mode\n");
          return -EINVAL;
      }
-    if (strict_strtoul_scaled(cbuf, &msec, 3) < 0)
+    ret = strict_strtoul_scaled(cbuf, &msec, 3);
+    if (ret < 0)
+        return ret;
+    if (msec > UINT_MAX)
          return -EINVAL;
+
      if (msec == 0)
          mddev->safemode_delay = 0;
      else {
          unsigned long old_delay = mddev->safemode_delay;
+        /* HZ <= 1000, so new_delay < UINT_MAX, too */

new_delay <= UNIT_MAX

          unsigned long new_delay = (msec*HZ)/1000;

There is no need do declare them as 'unsigned long', you can use
'unsigned int' directly now.

And you can also use DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP() directly here.


I will fix it in v3.

Thanks,
Kuai
          if (new_delay == 0)


.

--
Thanks,
Nan