Re: [PATCH] Fix some coding style errors in memblock.c

[Mike Rapoport]

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Claudio Migliorelli wrote:
> This patch removes the initialization of some static variables to 0 and
> `false` in the memblock source file, according to the coding style
> guidelines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Migliorelli <claudio.migliorelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry for the delay.
Applied, thanks!

>  mm/memblock.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 25fd0626a9e7..6f0a2eda427c 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -156,10 +156,10 @@ static __refdata struct memblock_type *memblock_memory = &memblock.memory;
>  	} while (0)
>  
>  static int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
> -static bool system_has_some_mirror __initdata_memblock = false;
> +static bool system_has_some_mirror __initdata_memblock;
>  static int memblock_can_resize __initdata_memblock;
> -static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
> -static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
> +static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock;
> +static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock;
>  
>  static enum memblock_flags __init_memblock choose_memblock_flags(void)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.38.4
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.