Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] test_firmware: fix a memory leak with reqs buffer

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Fri May 12 2023 - 09:09:47 EST


On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:34:29PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
> > @@ -1011,6 +1016,11 @@ ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_async_store(struct device *dev,
> > mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > + if (test_fw_config->reqs) {
> > + rc = -EBUSY;
> > + goto out_bail;
> > + }
> > +
> > test_fw_config->reqs =
> > vzalloc(array3_size(sizeof(struct test_batched_req),
> > test_fw_config->num_requests, 2));
>
> I was just thinking, since returning -EBUSY for the case of already allocated
> test_fw_config->reqs was your suggestion and your idea, maybe it would be OK
> to properly reflect that in Co-developed-by: or Signed-off-by: , but if I
> understood well, the CoC requires that I am explicitly approved of those?
>

If everyone else is okay, let's just apply this as-is. You did all the
hard bits.

regards,
dan carpenter