Re: [PATCH v2] w1: Replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable

[Jakob Koschel]

How strange, I just checked and my checkpatch doesn't complain.

I also redownloaded and double checked 
(b4 am 20230509-w1-replace-usage-of-found-with-tmp-list-iterator-variable-v2-1-259bf1ba44ed@xxxxxxxxx).

What's the exact issue you are seeing?

- jakob

On 23/05/12 09:27AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/05/2023 00:49, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> > To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> > macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> > variable after the loop body.
> > 
> > To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> > concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> > found boolean [1].
> > 
> > This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> > the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - fix checkpatch intentation issues
> 
> I don't see the differences and checkpatch still complains. Are you sure
> you sent v2?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>