Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs-idmapping tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:07:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Wed, 10 May 2023 06:48:39 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, since Linus didn't like the original approach, it was redone
> > and that particular patch was originally forgotten and then redone
> > without the 'nonblock' variable. So you should just ignore the
> > old version, and Christian should just drop that branch from his
> > for-next tree as it's dead.
> 
> That appears to have been done now, thanks.

Yeah, sorry. LSFMM makes it a bit hard to be consistent about my
replies and after my first reply I only had rolled vfs/for-next rolled
forward but not vfs-idmapping/for-next. The latter repo will likely go
away soonish and then only vfs/* will be left.

Christian