Re: [PATCH net-next v2] sctp: add bpf_bypass_getsockopt proto callback

From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
Date: Thu May 11 2023 - 09:29:30 EST


On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:12 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,

Hi Marcelo,

thanks! Fixed in -v3.

Kind regards,
Alex

>
> Two things:
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:31:48PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > Add bpf_bypass_getsockopt proto callback and filter out
> > SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF and SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_FLAGS socket options
> > from running eBPF hook on them.
> >
> > These options do fd_install(), and if BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT
> > hook returns an error after success of the original handler
> > sctp_getsockopt(...), userspace will receive an error from getsockopt
> > syscall and will be not aware that fd was successfully installed into fdtable.
> >
> > This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230413133355.350571-3-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Cool, but the description is mentioning the CONNECTX3 sockopt.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/sctp/socket.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> > index cda8c2874691..a211a203003c 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> > @@ -8281,6 +8281,35 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > return retval;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool sctp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> > +{
> > + if (level == SOL_SCTP) {
> > + switch (optname) {
> > + /*
> > + * These options do fd_install(), and if BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT
> > + * hook returns an error after success of the original handler
> > + * sctp_getsockopt(...), userspace will receive an error from getsockopt
> > + * syscall and will be not aware that fd was successfully installed into fdtable.
> > + *
> > + * Let's prevent bpf cgroup hook from running on them.
> > + */
>
> This and..
>
> > + case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF:
> > + case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_FLAGS:
> > + /*
> > + * As pointed by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner it seems reasonable to skip
> > + * bpf getsockopt hook for this sockopt too. Because internaly, it
> > + * triggers connect() and if error will be masked userspace can be confused.
> > + */
>
> ..this comments can be removed, as they are easily visible on the
> description later on for who is interested on why such lines were
> added.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcelo
>
> > + case SCTP_SOCKOPT_CONNECTX3:
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sctp_hash(struct sock *sk)
> > {
> > /* STUB */
> > @@ -9650,6 +9679,7 @@ struct proto sctp_prot = {
> > .shutdown = sctp_shutdown,
> > .setsockopt = sctp_setsockopt,
> > .getsockopt = sctp_getsockopt,
> > + .bpf_bypass_getsockopt = sctp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt,
> > .sendmsg = sctp_sendmsg,
> > .recvmsg = sctp_recvmsg,
> > .bind = sctp_bind,
> > @@ -9705,6 +9735,7 @@ struct proto sctpv6_prot = {
> > .shutdown = sctp_shutdown,
> > .setsockopt = sctp_setsockopt,
> > .getsockopt = sctp_getsockopt,
> > + .bpf_bypass_getsockopt = sctp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt,
> > .sendmsg = sctp_sendmsg,
> > .recvmsg = sctp_recvmsg,
> > .bind = sctp_bind,
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >