[RFC] MAINTAINERS: direct process doc changes to a dedicated ML

[Jakub Kicinski]

It's hard to keep track of changes to the process docs.
Subsystem maintainers should probably know what's going on,
to ensure reasonably uniform developer experience across
trees.

We also need a place where process discussions can be held
(i.e. designated mailing list which can be CCed on naturally
arising discussions). I'm using workflows@ in this RFC,
but a new list may be better.

No change to the patch flow intended.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I've been pondering the lack of cross-maintainer communication
as the kernel grows, and I hope this could help bring us together
a little. Plus twice over the last 2 weeks someone popped up on
netdev with what I personally considered incorrect interpretation
of the process docs, so it'd be nice to CC a list on my replies
so I can be corrected, in case I'm wrong.

Opinions more than welcome!
---
 MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1c78e61a3387..58239fbc7007 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6223,6 +6223,12 @@ X:	Documentation/power/
 X:	Documentation/spi/
 X:	Documentation/userspace-api/media/
 
+DOCUMENTATION PROCESS
+M:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
+S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/process/
+L:	workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+
 DOCUMENTATION REPORTING ISSUES
 M:	Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 L:	linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
2.40.1