Re: [PATCH net 6/6] net/sched: qdisc_destroy() old ingress and clsact Qdiscs before grafting

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Wed May 10 2023 - 19:16:09 EST


On Wed, 10 May 2023 13:11:19 -0700 Peilin Ye wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2023 17:16:10 -0700 Peilin Ye wrote:
> > Thread 1 creates ingress Qdisc A (containing mini Qdisc a1 and a2), then
> > adds a flower filter X to A.
> >
> > Thread 2 creates another ingress Qdisc B (containing mini Qdisc b1 and
> > b2) to replace A, then adds a flower filter Y to B.
> >
> > Thread 1 A's refcnt Thread 2
> > RTM_NEWQDISC (A, RTNL-locked)
> > qdisc_create(A) 1
> > qdisc_graft(A) 9
> >
> > RTM_NEWTFILTER (X, RTNL-lockless)
> > __tcf_qdisc_find(A) 10
> > tcf_chain0_head_change(A)
> > mini_qdisc_pair_swap(A) (1st)
> > |
> > | RTM_NEWQDISC (B, RTNL-locked)
> > RCU 2 qdisc_graft(B)
> > | 1 notify_and_destroy(A)
> > |
> > tcf_block_release(A) 0 RTM_NEWTFILTER (Y, RTNL-lockless)
> > qdisc_destroy(A) tcf_chain0_head_change(B)
> > tcf_chain0_head_change_cb_del(A) mini_qdisc_pair_swap(B) (2nd)
> > mini_qdisc_pair_swap(A) (3rd) |
> > ... ...
>
> Looking at the code, I think there is no guarantee that (1st) cannot
> happen after (2nd), although unlikely? Can RTNL-lockless RTM_NEWTFILTER
> handlers get preempted?

Right, we need qdisc_graft(B) to update the appropriate dev pointer
to point to b1. With that the ordering should not matter. Probably
using the ->attach() callback?

> If (1st) happens later than (2nd), we will need to make (1st) no-op, by
> detecting that we are the "old" Qdisc. I am not sure there is any
> (clean) way to do it. I even thought about:
>
> (1) Get the containing Qdisc of "miniqp" we are working on, "qdisc";
> (2) Test if "qdisc == qdisc->dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping". If false, it
> means we are the "old" Qdisc (have been replaced), and should do
> nothing.
>
> However, for clsact Qdiscs I don't know if "miniqp" is the ingress or
> egress one, so I can't container_of() during step (1) ...

And we can't be using multiple pieces of information to make
the decision since AFAIU mini_qdisc_pair_swap() can race with
qdisc_graft().

My thinking was to make sure that dev->miniq_* pointers always point
to one of the miniqs of the currently attached qdisc. Right now, on
a quick look, those pointers are not initialized during initial graft,
only when first filter is added, and may be cleared when filters are
removed. But I don't think that's strictly required, miniq with no
filters should be fine.

> Eventually I created [5,6/6]. It is a workaround indeed, in the sense
> that it changes sch_api.c to avoid a mini Qdisc issue. However I think it
> makes the code correct in a relatively understandable way,

What's your benchmark for being understandable?

> without slowing down mini_qdisc_pair_swap() or sch_handle_*gress().