Re: [PATCH net-next] net: core: add SOL_SOCKET filter for bpf getsockopt hook

From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
Date: Wed May 10 2023 - 17:41:07 EST


On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> > to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
> >
> > It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> > level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
> >
> > This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230413133355.350571-3-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> > include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> > net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> > int __ret = retval; \
> > if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> > cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> > - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> > - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> > + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> > + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
>
> Any reason we are not putting this into bpf_bypass_getsockopt for
> af_unix struct proto? SO_PEERPIDFD seems relevant only for af_unix?

Yes, that should work perfectly well. The reason why I'm going this
way is that we are
declaring all SOL_SOCKET-level options in the net/core/sock.c which is
not specific to any address family.
It seems reasonable to have a way to filter out getsockopt for these
options too.

But I'm not insisting on that way.

Kind regards,
Alex

>
> > + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > - level, optname)) \
> > + level, optname))) \
> > __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> > sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> > max_optlen, retval); \
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> > int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> > char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> > int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> > bool timeval, bool time32);
> > struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> > USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> > }
> >
> > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Initialize an sk_lock.
> > *
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >