Re: [PATCH 02/13] wifi: mwifiex: Use default @max_active for workqueues

[Kalle Valo]

Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These workqueues only host a single work item and thus doen't need explicit
> concurrency limit. Let's use the default @max_active. This doesn't cost
> anything and clearly expresses that @max_active doesn't matter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I didn't review the patch but I assume it's ok. Feel free to take it via your
tree:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch set to Not Applicable.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20230509015032.3768622-3-tj@xxxxxxxxxx/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches