Re: [PATCH v4] ACPI: cpufreq: use a platform device to load ACPI PPC and PCC drivers

From: Kevin Locke
Date: Tue May 09 2023 - 20:08:28 EST


On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:10 +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> The patch extends the ACPI parsing logic to check the ACPI namespace if
> the PPC or PCC interface is present and creates a virtual platform
> device for each if it is available. The acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq
> drivers are then updated to map to these devices.
>
> This allows to try loading acpi-cpufreq and pcc-cpufreq only once during
> boot and only if a given interface is available in the firmware.

As a result of this patch (691a637123470bfe63bccf5836ead40fac4c7fab)
my ThinkPad T430 with an i5-3320M CPU configured with
CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y and CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m (Debian's
amd64 kernel config) now logs

kernel: acpi-cpufreq: probe of acpi-cpufreq failed with error -17

during boot. Presumably this occurs because loading acpi-cpufreq
returns -EEXIST when intel-pstate is already loaded (or built-in, as
in this case). I'm unsure why the message was not printed before;
perhaps a difference between driver probing for platform and cpu bus
types? Although the error message is not wrong, it may lead to
unnecessary investigation by sysadmins, as it did for me. I thought
it was worth reporting so you can consider whether the change is
desirable.

Cheers,
Kevin