Re: [PATCH] can: length: add definitions for frame lengths in bits

[Vincent MAILHOL]

Hi Thomas,

On Mon. 9 May 2023 at 16:12, <Thomas.Kopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> Right, do you plan on separating this for Arbitration bitrate and databitrate? It would probably make sense to use a fixed number of worst case stuffbits for the arbitration phase and the formula for the data phase.

I have a few ideas how to implement it, but seeing how complex things
are going, I am thinking of creating an inline helper function for the
bitstuffing calculation (the compiler should be able to fold it into a
constant expression, so there should be no penalty).

For the exact details, I have not decided yet. I need to experiment.
This not being so trivial and not having so much free time now, please
wait a few days for the v2 ;)