Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: Move dts files to vendor sub-directories

[Tony Lindgren]

* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [230505 22:47]:
> Tony,
> 
> On 22:29-20230504, Rob Herring wrote:
> > As discussed and attempted several times before[1][2], the flat arm32 
> > directory of 1553 platforms has grown unwieldy. Past attempts stalled 
> > out due to plans to move .dts files out of the kernel tree. Doing that 
> > is no longer planned (any time soon at least), so let's go ahead and 
> > group .dts files by vendors. This move aligns arm with arm64 .dts file 
> > structure.
> [...]
> 
> Wondering if it makes to have any sense of grouping per TI SoC arch? at
> least will be clear as to what is going on?
> 
> ti/omap2 or ti/omap ?
> 
> >     'am3' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'am4' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'am5' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'dra' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'keystone' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/keystone ?
> >     'omap' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'compulab' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'logicpd' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'elpida' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'motorola' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'twl' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/omap ?
> >     'da' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/davinci ?
> >     'dm' : 'ti',
> ^^ group  as ti/davinci ?
> 
> For me at least, this cleanly seperates things up.

No objections from me to adding TI subdirectories. Rob, any issues with this?

Regards,

Tony