Re: [PATCH V2] locking: Fix a typo of comment

[Randy Dunlap]

On 5/8/23 19:24, Wang Honghui wrote:
> 
> As title
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Honghui <honghui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> index d973fe6041bf..fe7335fb63d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
>  		 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
>  		 * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
>  		 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the

		   critical

> -		 * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
> +		 * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
>  		 * period

		   period.

>  		 */
>  		barrier();
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
> -	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
> +	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct

	   critical

>  	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
>  	 */
>  	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);

-- 
~Randy