Re: [PATCH 00/40] Memory allocation profiling

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 06:09:13PM +0200, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> Sure, although AFAIK the index does not cover all possible config
> options (so non-x86 arch code is often forgotten). However, that's the
> less important part.
> 
> What do you do if you need to hook something that does conflict with an
> existing identifier?

As already happens in this patchset, rename the other identifier.

But this is C, we avoid these kinds of conflicts already because the
language has no namespacing - it's going to be a pretty rare situtaion
going forward. Most of the hooking that will be done is done with this
patchset, and there was only one identifier that needed to be renamed.