Re: [Question] softlockup in run_timer_softirq

[liujian (CE)]

On 2023/5/4 10:59, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 6:50 PM liujian (CE) <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2023/5/2 11:06, John Stultz wrote:
> > > So I wanted to revive this old thread, as Frank Woo mentioned his team
> > > has seen a similar issue as well.
> > >
> > > Liujian: I'm curious if you've made any further progress with your
> > > adapted patch ontop of PeterZ's softirq_needs_break patch series?
> > Hi John,
> >     Only the commit ("softirq, timer: Use softirq_needs_break()") is
> > added to the patchset of Peter, and no other modification is made.
> > > Might it be worth re-submitting the whole series for consideration upstream?
> > I agree very much and expect, because we often encounter similar
> > problems when doing fuzzy tests (especially when the test machine is poor).
>
> Ok. Will you submit the series + your patch to the list for review and
> consideration then?
The patch[1] has been sent out. Please help review it. Thank you very much.
[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230505113315.3307723-1-liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx/

> Please include Frank and Rhine on CC so they can validate and provide
> Tested-by: tags if it works for them as well.
>
> thanks
> -john