Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4210-rb2: Enable aDSP and cDSP remoteproc nodes

[Bhupesh Sharma]

On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 17:53, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 14:58, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 1.05.2023 12:58, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > Enable the aDSP and cDSP remoteproc nodes on Qualcomm QRB4210 RB2 board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > > index bff6ba1d689f..3ab46499d3fa 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ &qupv3_id_0 {
> > >       status = "okay";
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > > +     status = "okay";
> > > +     firmware-name = "qcom/sm6115/adsp.mdt";
> > status last
> > also, don't we want to use .mbn (squashed binary)?
>
> Yes, please. Also, just to make sure, are sm6115 and qrb4210 binaries
> fully compatible? We already have a mess of sdm845 vs sda845.

That's a fair point. Let's use qrb4210 naming instead of sm6115 here.
I will send a fixed version shortly.

Thanks,
Bhupesh