Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] venus: add firmware version based check

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 4.05.2023 11:49, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> 
> On 5/4/2023 3:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>> On 4.05.2023 11:39, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>>> Add firmware version based checks to enable/disable
>>> features for different SOCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viswanath Boma <quic_vboma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Nathan Hebert <nhebert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h     | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_msgs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
>>> index 32551c2..2f2176f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
>>> @@ -202,6 +202,11 @@ struct venus_core {
>>>       unsigned int core0_usage_count;
>>>       unsigned int core1_usage_count;
>>>       struct dentry *root;
>>> +    struct venus_img_version {
>>> +        u32 major;
>>> +        u32 minor;
>>> +        u32 rev;
>>> +    } venus_ver;
>>>   };
>>>     struct vdec_controls {
>>> @@ -500,4 +505,19 @@ venus_caps_by_codec(struct venus_core *core, u32 codec, u32 domain)
>>>       return NULL;
>>>   }
>>>   +static inline bool
>>> +is_fw_rev_or_newer(struct venus_core *core, u32 vmajor, u32 vminor, u32 vrev)
>>> +{
>>> +    return ((core)->venus_ver.major == vmajor &&
>>> +        (core)->venus_ver.minor == vminor &&
>>> +        (core)->venus_ver.rev >= vrev);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool
>>> +is_fw_rev_or_older(struct venus_core *core, u32 vmajor, u32 vminor, u32 vrev)
>>> +{
>>> +    return ((core)->venus_ver.major == vmajor &&
>>> +        (core)->venus_ver.minor == vminor &&
>>> +        (core)->venus_ver.rev <= vrev);
>>> +}
>>>   #endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_msgs.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_msgs.c
>>> index df96db3..4854863 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_msgs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_msgs.c
>>> @@ -248,13 +248,16 @@ static void hfi_sys_init_done(struct venus_core *core, struct venus_inst *inst,
>>>   }
>>>     static void
>>> -sys_get_prop_image_version(struct device *dev,
>>> +sys_get_prop_image_version(struct venus_core *core,
>>>                  struct hfi_msg_sys_property_info_pkt *pkt)
>>>   {
>>> +    struct device *dev = core->dev;
>>>       u8 *smem_tbl_ptr;
>>>       u8 *img_ver;
>>>       int req_bytes;
>>>       size_t smem_blk_sz;
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +    u8 *ver_str;
>>>         req_bytes = pkt->hdr.size - sizeof(*pkt);
>>>   @@ -263,6 +266,26 @@ sys_get_prop_image_version(struct device *dev,
>>>           return;
>>>         img_ver = pkt->data;
>>> +    if (IS_V6(core) && core->res->num_vpp_pipes == 1) {
>>> +        ret = sscanf(img_ver, "14:video-firmware.%u.%u-%u",
>>> +                 &core->venus_ver.major, &core->venus_ver.minor, &core->venus_ver.rev);
>> This is still not perfect, 8350 has 4 vpp pipes and its firmware is
>> also denominated with "video-firmware".. perhaps we can just try
>> each variant until we reach ret == 3?
> 
> sc7280 onward firmware have image string as "video-firmware".
> 
> Support for 8350 is not yet added in venus driver, any required change for the same can be done
> 
> when support will be added for the same.
I understand, but that doesn't mean this can't be improved:

ret = sscanf(.. video-firmware .. )
if (ret == 2) {
	/* video-firmware string doesn't provide rev info */
	ver.rev = (something);
	goto done;
}

ret = sscanf(.. VIDEO.VE .. )
if (ret == 3)
	goto done;

ret = sscanf(.. VIDEO.VPU .. )
if (ret != 3) {
	/* We ran out of options! */
	return -EINVAL;
}

done:
	// continue the code flow


> 
>>> +        if (ret != 2) {
>> 3?
> 
> this image version string doesn't return valid revision hence checking against 2 (major and minor versions)
So why are you filling the revision field with an invalid value?

let's take a version string from a firmware I have on hand:

14:video-firmware.1.0-3fb5add1d3ac96f8f74facd537845a6ceb5a99e4

this will evaluate to:

maj = 1
min = 0
rev = 3

since it's incorrect, drop the last argument and initialize it with
something like UINT_MAX or 0xdeadbeef

On a note, you left ver_str unused in this patch, so it doesn't work
for VIDEO.VPU anyway

Konrad
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dikshita
> 
>>
>> Konrad
>>> +            dev_dbg(dev, VDBGL "error reading F/W version\n");
>>> +            return;
>>> +        }
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        if (IS_V6(core))
>>> +            ver_str = "14:VIDEO.VPU.%u.%u-%u";
>>> +        else
>>> +            ver_str = "14:VIDEO.VE.%u.%u-%u";
>>> +
>>> +        ret = sscanf(img_ver, "14:VIDEO.VE.%u.%u-%u",
>>> +                 &core->venus_ver.major, &core->venus_ver.minor, &core->venus_ver.rev);
>>> +        if (ret != 3) {
>>> +            dev_dbg(dev, VDBGL "error reading F/W version\n");
>>> +            return;
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>>         dev_dbg(dev, VDBGL "F/W version: %s\n", img_ver);
>>>   @@ -286,7 +309,7 @@ static void hfi_sys_property_info(struct venus_core *core,
>>>         switch (pkt->property) {
>>>       case HFI_PROPERTY_SYS_IMAGE_VERSION:
>>> -        sys_get_prop_image_version(dev, pkt);
>>> +        sys_get_prop_image_version(core, pkt);
>>>           break;
>>>       default:
>>>           dev_dbg(dev, VDBGL "unknown property data\n");