Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx93: introduce clk_bypassed module parameter

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/05/2023 11:17, Peng Fan wrote:
> + DT maintainers.
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx93: introduce clk_bypassed module
>> parameter
>>
>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> With the clk names specified in clk_bypassed module parameter, give
>>> user an option to bypass the clk from managing them by Linux kernel.
>>
>> As I said on another email, no, please do not add new module parameters
>> for drivers, this is not the 1990s
> 
> ok, but this is for boot, so only DT could be considered.
> 
> But DT is to describe hardware, here I just wanna give user
> an option to bypass some clocks. Is it ok to add a DT property
> saying "fsl,imx93-bypass-clks = <IMX93_CLK_X>, <IMX93_CLK_Y>" ?
> 

I don't know what it is to "bypass some clocks". This does not look like
parameter for system at all.

Best regards,
Krzysztof