Re: [PATCH] i2c: gxp: fix build failure without CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Wed May 03 2023 - 11:23:39 EST


On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> The gxp_i2c_slave_irq_handler() is hidden in an #ifdef, but the
> caller uses an IS_ENABLED() check:
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gxp.c: In function 'gxp_i2c_irq_handler':
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gxp.c:467:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'gxp_i2c_slave_irq_handler'; did you mean 'gxp_i2c_irq_handler'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> It has to consistently use one method or the other to avoid warnings,
> so move to IS_ENABLED() here for readability and build coverage, and
> move the #ifdef in linux/i2c.h to allow building it as dead code.
>
> Fixes: 4a55ed6f89f5 ("i2c: Add GXP SoC I2C Controller")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-current, thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature