Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing to file-backed mappings

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue May 02 2023 - 22:18:41 EST


On Tue, 2 May 2023 23:51:35 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Writing to file-backed dirty-tracked mappings via GUP is inherently broken
> as we cannot rule out folios being cleaned and then a GUP user writing to
> them again and possibly marking them dirty unexpectedly.
>
> This is especially egregious for long-term mappings (as indicated by the
> use of the FOLL_LONGTERM flag), so we disallow this case in GUP-fast as
> we have already done in the slow path.
>
> We have access to less information in the fast path as we cannot examine
> the VMA containing the mapping, however we can determine whether the folio
> is anonymous or belonging to a whitelisted filesystem - specifically
> hugetlb and shmem mappings.
>
> We take special care to ensure that both the folio and mapping are safe to
> access when performing these checks and document folio_fast_pin_allowed()
> accordingly.
>
> It's important to note that there are no APIs allowing users to specify
> FOLL_FAST_ONLY for a PUP-fast let alone with FOLL_LONGTERM, so we can
> always rely on the fact that if we fail to pin on the fast path, the code
> will fall back to the slow path which can perform the more thorough check.

arm allnoconfig said

mm/gup.c:115:13: warning: 'folio_fast_pin_allowed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
115 | static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

so I moved the definition inside CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.



mm/gup.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/gup.c~mm-gup-disallow-foll_longterm-gup-fast-writing-to-file-backed-mappings-fix
+++ a/mm/gup.c
@@ -96,83 +96,6 @@ retry:
return folio;
}

-/*
- * Used in the GUP-fast path to determine whether a pin is permitted for a
- * specific folio.
- *
- * This call assumes the caller has pinned the folio, that the lowest page table
- * level still points to this folio, and that interrupts have been disabled.
- *
- * Writing to pinned file-backed dirty tracked folios is inherently problematic
- * (see comment describing the writable_file_mapping_allowed() function). We
- * therefore try to avoid the most egregious case of a long-term mapping doing
- * so.
- *
- * This function cannot be as thorough as that one as the VMA is not available
- * in the fast path, so instead we whitelist known good cases and if in doubt,
- * fall back to the slow path.
- */
-static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
-{
- struct address_space *mapping;
- unsigned long mapping_flags;
-
- /*
- * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
- * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow.
- */
- if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) !=
- (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE))
- return true;
-
- /* The folio is pinned, so we can safely access folio fields. */
-
- /* Neither of these should be possible, but check to be sure. */
- if (unlikely(folio_test_slab(folio) || folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
- return false;
-
- /* hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking. */
- if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
- return true;
-
- /*
- * GUP-fast disables IRQs. When IRQS are disabled, RCU grace periods
- * cannot proceed, which means no actions performed under RCU can
- * proceed either.
- *
- * inodes and thus their mappings are freed under RCU, which means the
- * mapping cannot be freed beneath us and thus we can safely dereference
- * it.
- */
- lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-
- /*
- * However, there may be operations which _alter_ the mapping, so ensure
- * we read it once and only once.
- */
- mapping = READ_ONCE(folio->mapping);
-
- /*
- * The mapping may have been truncated, in any case we cannot determine
- * if this mapping is safe - fall back to slow path to determine how to
- * proceed.
- */
- if (!mapping)
- return false;
-
- /* Anonymous folios are fine, other non-file backed cases are not. */
- mapping_flags = (unsigned long)mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS;
- if (mapping_flags)
- return mapping_flags == PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
-
- /*
- * At this point, we know the mapping is non-null and points to an
- * address_space object. The only remaining whitelisted file system is
- * shmem.
- */
- return shmem_mapping(mapping);
-}
-
/**
* try_grab_folio() - Attempt to get or pin a folio.
* @page: pointer to page to be grabbed
@@ -2474,6 +2397,83 @@ static void __maybe_unused undo_dev_page

#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
/*
+ * Used in the GUP-fast path to determine whether a pin is permitted for a
+ * specific folio.
+ *
+ * This call assumes the caller has pinned the folio, that the lowest page table
+ * level still points to this folio, and that interrupts have been disabled.
+ *
+ * Writing to pinned file-backed dirty tracked folios is inherently problematic
+ * (see comment describing the writable_file_mapping_allowed() function). We
+ * therefore try to avoid the most egregious case of a long-term mapping doing
+ * so.
+ *
+ * This function cannot be as thorough as that one as the VMA is not available
+ * in the fast path, so instead we whitelist known good cases and if in doubt,
+ * fall back to the slow path.
+ */
+static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping;
+ unsigned long mapping_flags;
+
+ /*
+ * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
+ * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow.
+ */
+ if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) !=
+ (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE))
+ return true;
+
+ /* The folio is pinned, so we can safely access folio fields. */
+
+ /* Neither of these should be possible, but check to be sure. */
+ if (unlikely(folio_test_slab(folio) || folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
+ return false;
+
+ /* hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking. */
+ if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * GUP-fast disables IRQs. When IRQS are disabled, RCU grace periods
+ * cannot proceed, which means no actions performed under RCU can
+ * proceed either.
+ *
+ * inodes and thus their mappings are freed under RCU, which means the
+ * mapping cannot be freed beneath us and thus we can safely dereference
+ * it.
+ */
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+ /*
+ * However, there may be operations which _alter_ the mapping, so ensure
+ * we read it once and only once.
+ */
+ mapping = READ_ONCE(folio->mapping);
+
+ /*
+ * The mapping may have been truncated, in any case we cannot determine
+ * if this mapping is safe - fall back to slow path to determine how to
+ * proceed.
+ */
+ if (!mapping)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Anonymous folios are fine, other non-file backed cases are not. */
+ mapping_flags = (unsigned long)mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS;
+ if (mapping_flags)
+ return mapping_flags == PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, we know the mapping is non-null and points to an
+ * address_space object. The only remaining whitelisted file system is
+ * shmem.
+ */
+ return shmem_mapping(mapping);
+}
+
+/*
* Fast-gup relies on pte change detection to avoid concurrent pgtable
* operations.
*
_