Re: arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:34:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_misaligned_access_speed' was not declared. Should it be static?

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue May 02 2023 - 11:50:16 EST

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH 28/40] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH] Documentation: timers: hrtimers: Make hybrid union historical"
In reply to: Evan Green: "Re: arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:34:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_misaligned_access_speed' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:42:49AM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> Conor, this one was fixed by your patch to include cpufeature.h in
> cpufeature.c, right?

Aye. Surprised to see the LKP sparse working, but
"v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty" probably explains why!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH 28/40] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH] Documentation: timers: hrtimers: Make hybrid union historical"
In reply to: Evan Green: "Re: arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:34:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_misaligned_access_speed' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]