Re: [PATCH] misc: hpilo: Fix use after free bug in ilo_remove due to race condition with ilo_open

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Tue May 02 2023 - 07:46:55 EST


Hi Zheng,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zheng-Wang/misc-hpilo-Fix-use-after-free-bug-in-ilo_remove-due-to-race-condition-with-ilo_open/20230418-005502
base: char-misc/char-misc-testing
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230417165246.467723-1-zyytlz.wz%40163.com
patch subject: [PATCH] misc: hpilo: Fix use after free bug in ilo_remove due to race condition with ilo_open
config: i386-randconfig-m021 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230430/202304300909.ALHN6Vry-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202304300909.ALHN6Vry-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

smatch warnings:
drivers/misc/hpilo.c:755 ilo_delete() warn: can 'ilo_hw' even be NULL?

vim +/ilo_hw +755 drivers/misc/hpilo.c

13a22f45e6cb1e Zheng Wang 2023-04-18 749 static void ilo_delete(struct kref *kref)
13a22f45e6cb1e Zheng Wang 2023-04-18 750 {
13a22f45e6cb1e Zheng Wang 2023-04-18 751 int i, minor;
13a22f45e6cb1e Zheng Wang 2023-04-18 752 struct ilo_hwinfo *ilo_hw = container_of(kref, struct ilo_hwinfo, refcnt);
13a22f45e6cb1e Zheng Wang 2023-04-18 753 struct pci_dev *pdev = ilo_hw->ilo_dev;
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 754
ebf1b764aa5cb3 Mark Rusk 2012-11-06 @755 if (!ilo_hw)
^^^^^^^

->refcnt member isn't the first struct member so this NULL check
doesn't make sense. Generally checking container_of() is ugly. Some
people do it and add BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure that they're checking the
first struct member but really it's best to avoid that if possible.

ebf1b764aa5cb3 Mark Rusk 2012-11-06 756 return;
ebf1b764aa5cb3 Mark Rusk 2012-11-06 757
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 758 clear_device(ilo_hw);
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 759
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 760 minor = MINOR(ilo_hw->cdev.dev);
98dcd59dd063dd Camuso, Tony 2012-06-10 761 for (i = minor; i < minor + max_ccb; i++)
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 762 device_destroy(ilo_class, MKDEV(ilo_major, i));
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 763
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 764 cdev_del(&ilo_hw->cdev);
9f7048412163d8 David Altobelli 2009-08-17 765 ilo_disable_interrupts(ilo_hw);
9f7048412163d8 David Altobelli 2009-08-17 766 free_irq(pdev->irq, ilo_hw);
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 767 ilo_unmap_device(pdev, ilo_hw);
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 768 pci_release_regions(pdev);
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 769 /*
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 770 * pci_disable_device(pdev) used to be here. But this PCI device has
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 771 * two functions with interrupt lines connected to a single pin. The
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 772 * other one is a USB host controller. So when we disable the PIN here
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 773 * e.g. by rmmod hpilo, the controller stops working. It is because
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 774 * the interrupt link is disabled in ACPI since it is not refcounted
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 775 * yet. See acpi_pci_link_free_irq called from acpi_pci_irq_disable.
bcdee04ea7ae04 Jiri Slaby 2012-09-13 776 */
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 777 kfree(ilo_hw);
98dcd59dd063dd Camuso, Tony 2012-06-10 778 ilo_hwdev[(minor / max_ccb)] = 0;
89bcb05d9bbf8b David Altobelli 2008-07-02 779 }

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests