[PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zba and Zbb

[Evan Green]

Add two new bits to the IMA_EXT_0 key for ZBA and ZBB extensions. These
are accurately reported per CPU.

Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

---

 Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst       |  7 +++++
 arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h |  2 ++
 arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c         | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
index 9f0dd62dcb5d..21f444a38359 100644
--- a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
@@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ The following keys are defined:
   * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C`: The C extension is supported, as defined
     by version 2.2 of the RISC-V ISA manual.
 
+  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA`: The Zba address generation extension is
+       supported, as defined in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA
+       extensions.
+
+  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_ZBB`: The Zbb extension is supporte, as defined
+       in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions.
+
 * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0`: A bitmask that contains performance
   information about the selected set of processors.
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
index 8d745a4ad8a2..ef3b060d4e8d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0	4
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD		(1 << 0)
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C		(1 << 1)
+#define		RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA		(1 << 2)
+#define		RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB		(1 << 3)
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0	5
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN	(0 << 0)
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED	(1 << 0)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
index 5db29683ebee..adfcb6b64db7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
@@ -121,6 +121,41 @@ static void hwprobe_arch_id(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
 	pair->value = id;
 }
 
+static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
+			     const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	u64 missing = 0;
+
+	pair->value = 0;
+	if (has_fpu())
+		pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
+
+	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
+		pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C;
+
+	/*
+	 * Loop through and record extensions that 1) anyone has, and 2) anyone
+	 * doesn't have.
+	 */
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
+		struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
+
+		if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA))
+			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
+		else
+			missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
+
+		if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB))
+			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
+		else
+			missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
+	}
+
+	/* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */
+	pair->value &= ~missing;
+}
+
 static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -164,13 +199,7 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
 		break;
 
 	case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0:
-		pair->value = 0;
-		if (has_fpu())
-			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
-
-		if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
-			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C;
-
+		hwprobe_isa_ext0(pair, cpus);
 		break;
 
 	case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0:
-- 
2.25.1