Re: [PATCH] Revert arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Fri Apr 28 2023 - 13:02:19 EST


+ Mike and Andrew

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:36:45AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> While the ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER changes clarified the descriptions quite
> a bit, the aarch64 specific change moved this config to sit behind
> CONFIG_EXPERT. This becomes problematic when distros are setting this to
> a non default value already. Pushing it behind EXPERT where it was not
> before will silently change the configuration for users building with
> oldconfig. If distros patch out if EXPERT downstream, it still creates
> problems for users testing out upstream patches, or trying to bisect to
> find the root of problem, as the configuration will change unexpectedly,
> possibly leading to different behavior and false results.
>
> Whem I asked about reverting the EXPERT, dependency, I was asked to add
> the ranges back.
>
> This essentially reverts commit 34affcd7577a232803f729d1870ba475f294e4ea
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index b1201d25a8a4..dae18ac01e94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1516,9 +1516,11 @@ config XEN
> # 16K | 27 | 14 | 13 | 11 |
> # 64K | 29 | 16 | 13 | 13 |
> config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> - int "Order of maximal physically contiguous allocations" if EXPERT && (ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES)
> + int "Order of maximal physically contiguous allocations" if ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES
> default "13" if ARM64_64K_PAGES
> + range 11 13 if ARM64_16K_PAGES
> default "11" if ARM64_16K_PAGES
> + range 10 15 if ARM64_4K_PAGES
> default "10"
> help
> The kernel page allocator limits the size of maximal physically

The revert looks fine to me:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>

For the record, the original discussion:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFxkdAr5C7ggZ+WdvDbsfmwuXujT_z_x3qcUnhnCn-WrAurvgA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx