Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] HP BIOSCFG driver - bioscfg-h

From: Jorge Lopez
Date: Fri Apr 28 2023 - 12:19:36 EST


On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:09 AM Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-28 11:03:56-0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:36 AM Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2023-04-28 10:24:40-0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 7:01 AM Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2023-04-20 11:54:48-0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/bioscfg.h | 613 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 613 insertions(+)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/bioscfg.h
>
> <snip>
>
> > > > > > +#define ATTRIBUTE_PROPERTY_STORE(curr_val, type) \
> > > > > > + static ssize_t curr_val##_store(struct kobject *kobj, \
> > > > > > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, \
> > > > > > + const char *buf, size_t count) \
> > > > > > + { \
> > > > > > + char *p = NULL; \
> > > > > > + char *attr_value = NULL; \
> > > > > > + int i; \
> > > > > > + int ret = -EIO; \
> > > > > > + \
> > > > > > + attr_value = kstrdup(buf, GFP_KERNEL); \
> > > > > > + if (!attr_value) \
> > > > > > + return -ENOMEM; \
> > > > > > + \
> > > > > > + p = memchr(attr_value, '\n', count); \
> > > > > > + if (p != NULL) \
> > > > > > + *p = '\0'; \
> > > > >
> > > > > This can also truncate the string if there is data after the newline.
> > > >
> > > > This is a expected behavior as described by Hans in a later email
> > >
> > > I'm fine with stripping a trailing newline.
> > >
> > > But this truncates the string at the first newline.
> > >
> > > "foo\nbar" -> "foo"
> > > "\nfoo" -> ""
> > >
> > All inputs expected by this driver and respectively by BIOS are a
> > single line. For this reason, '\n' will cause the string to be
> > truncated.
> > I propose reporting a warning message indicating that the data entered
> > has a '\n' character and will be truncated in addition to failing the
> > operation with -EINVAL
>
> EINVAL sounds good, but a warning is overkill IMO.
>
> Whoever put in the garbage value will see the error.
>
> Stripping a trailing newline still seems fine though.

So. should the driver return an -EINVAL error or truncate the line,
report a warning message, and allow it to proceed.?
Please advice

> This would be a very good candidate for a helper function.