Re: [RFC PATCH] regmap: force update_bits() to write to HW when reg is volatile

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:36:51PM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> On 4/28/23 14:35, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I think you're looking for regmap_write_bits() here.

> Yes. Thanks for pointing this out to me. This is the functionality I 
> searched for.

> However, my question really was if the regmap_update_bits() (and 
> regmap_set_bits() / regmap_clear_bits()) should automatically work as 
> regmap_write_bits() for volatile registers. I'll take your answer as 
> "no" - and try to remember just use regmap_write_bits() with volatile 
> registers which may require forcing writing the value even when it is 
> not changed. Thanks!

Yeah, like you said in your commit there are cases where suppressing the
write is still useful - you might have some bits that are volatile and
some not or you might have something like a pattern where the hardware
can set bits and the host writes 1 to clear.  One common thing is to
have read only status bits mixed in with normal read/write bits.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature