Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf list: Modify the warning message about scandirat(3)

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Thu Apr 27 2023 - 20:31:18 EST


On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:05 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It should mention scandirat() instead of scandir().
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fwiw, tracing_events__scandir_alphasort assumes scandir is present
unconditionally.

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
> tools/perf/util/print-events.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print-events.c b/tools/perf/util/print-events.c
> index 0a97912fd894..299973876550 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/print-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/print-events.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void print_tracepoint_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb __maybe_unus
> free(sys_namelist);
> }
> #else
> - printf("\nWARNING: Your libc doesn't have the scandir function, please ask its maintainers to implement it.\n"
> + printf("\nWARNING: Your libc doesn't have the scandirat function, please ask its maintainers to implement it.\n"
> " As a rough fallback, please do 'ls %s' to see the available tracepoint events.\n", events_path);
> #endif
> close(events_fd);
> --
> 2.40.1.495.gc816e09b53d-goog
>