Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-integrity: drop integrity_kobj from gendisk

[Thomas Weißschuh]

On 2023-04-26 18:26:11-0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/26/23 5:12?PM, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> > Hi Martin, Christoph, Jens,
> > 
> > On 2023-03-20 07:56:58-0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>> The embedded member integrity_kobj member of struct gendisk violates
> >>> the assumption of the driver core that only one struct kobject should
> >>> be embedded into another object and then manages its lifetime.
> >>>
> >>> As the integrity_kobj is only used to hold a few sysfs attributes it
> >>> can be replaced by direct device_attributes and removed.
> >>
> >> Looks good to me and passed a quick test on a couple of systems. Thanks
> >> for cleaning this up!
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Am I getting some part of the process for block/ wrong?
> 
> Sorry, I missed this series. I'll queue it up for 6.4.

Thanks!

> > It seems my patches for the block subsystem are having a hard time
> > getting merged.
> > 
> > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221110052438.2188-1-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> This one is missing nbd review. It's unfortunately not uncommon to need
> to re-ping on something like this, if you don't get a timely review.
> This is not specific to this patch, just in general. Things get missed.

Will do.

> > * this series
> > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419-const-partition-v2-0-817b58f85cd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> This one is just a week old, and coming into the merge window. Generally
> takes longer at that time, as it's late for that merge window, and folks
> are busy with getting things ready. If nothing happens on this one, I'd
> suggest resending past -rc1 when folks are more ready to review and
> queue things up for the next release.

Indeed, it is only listed for completeness sake.

I assumed that because all three series were like this, that I maybe
missed some PATCH prefix for your filter, managed to end up in your
killfile or mails from my privately managed mailservers don't get
through.

This is why I also wrote to Martin and Christoph, fearing that you don't
see my mails.

Thanks for the clarification,
Thomas